ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss Amedica: future Cervical ADR, ceramic in the General Discussion forums; http://www.amedicacorp.com/ Amedica uses " silicon nitride ceramic technology " for its Cervical artifical disc. Cervical artificial disc IDE (investigational device ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-14-2007, 11:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 776
Default

http://www.amedicacorp.com/


Amedica uses "silicon nitride ceramic technology" for its Cervical artifical disc.
Cervical artificial disc IDE (investigational device exemption) may start in 200?. Amedica
develops products for spine, hips and knees. Fusion spacers, small stuff, will
be the first product(s) to market.

Net result is favorable for a medium to long term ADR solution time frame wise
from what I read/heard in an analyst presentation. A login is required to see
the presentation and I identified myself as a patient for access.

The ~interesting silicon nitride ceramic points / factors:
<LI>Reduced wear debris
<LI>Biocompatible
<LI>Strength / toughness
<LI>Favorable imaging (ghost-like appearance, ~amazing)

Biointegration was brought up; it's porous so it promotes bone ingrowth.

What the dickens is silicon nitride ceramic I asked myself. Turns
out the material this special ceramic is used in Aerospace, turbines
impellers, ... Formula 1 Racing, engines, transmissions, ...
Comparing the ceramic to PEEK it appears to have advantages.

Bottom Line: for ADR material it may reduce the bio-burden of wear debris.

Limited view of a lay person given above, not medically trained.
__________________

----------------------------------------------------------


slackwater_sf
2004 MVA, 2-level lumbar surgical candidate
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2007, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

One note about toughness, which from the engineering standpoint isn't the same thing as strength, silicon nitride isn't as tough as the metals used but is likely to be much stronger than them. Obviously both the ceramic and metal are stronger and tougher than PE but both are less compliant so the heavier shock loads in the L-spine might be problematic for the ceramic design.
__________________
Laura - L5S1 Charitee
C5/6 and 6/7 Prodisc C
Facet problems L4-S1
Knee, Shoulder, Toe, Finger, Elbow Problems

Jim - no spine problem but lots of other fun medical challenges

"There are many Annapurnas in the lives of men" Maurice Herzog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
advice for the future theax Spinal Roundtable 10 07-02-2008 01:33 AM
SpinalKinetics: Future Cervical ADR, M6 Slackwater Arthroplasty Central 5 03-29-2008 08:51 AM
Here Come the Titanium/Ceramic Composite ADR'S biffnoble Arthroplasty Central 5 12-13-2005 12:03 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12