ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss Any change in the core between the Prodisc C and the New Prodisc Nova C ? in the General Discussion forums; Nova Prodisc compared to original Prodisc C - I have gone to the net to try to find this answer ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 101
Default Any change in the core between the Prodisc C and the New Prodisc Nova C ?

Nova Prodisc compared to original Prodisc C -

I have gone to the net to try to find this answer & am not finding it. I know they revised the upper keels on the Nova Prodisc compared to it's former model but can anyone tell me if the polyethylene core is any different ? Is it still as hard as the 1st model is ? I am familiar with the Prodisc Lumbar & it was a bit more flexible in feel at the poly core, than the Prodisc C model I played with in a doc's office one day waiting for him to come in.

It was much harder than the lumbar's core & I was suprised as how this sample the metal barely fit over the core and how much it slopped out of the metal I wondered if the core was really matched to the endplates for this sample well or what - now I assume once implanted this was on a vertebrae model though & was stabilized - when I noticed how much it moved out of the outer core. I then slipped off the verterbraes off the metal post so I could remove the Cervical ADR to open it up & feel the core.

Is the prodisc c nova core any softer than earlier model prodisc C ? Or is it basically the same that way. I did think perhaps they didn't have the right sized endcaps so to speak over this core perhaps.

I do like the Mobi-C & Activ -C of what I can see of them. I wonder when Activ-C will come into the USA for trials? In the Netherlands now but must speak dutch

Thanks - Jill
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:50 AM
JKDE302's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 214
Default Interesting...

I would also like more info on this...
__________________
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2009, 03:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 101
Default

________________________________________
One thing while I still dont have the question if the core itself has changed or not between the Prodisc C & the newer Prodisc C Nova - I did call to the Prodisc PAL assitance - in the USA they are still using which makes sense what was approved for FDA use when it was in the trials - it was not the newer Nova in the FDA trials but the Prodisc C with the same keels on both ends - he knows nothing about the newer Nova as that would be Europe. I asked if the keels were the same height on both ends on the one used in the USA he said yes. The newer Nova from what I understand is with the same lenght of keel on the bottom as the previous model but the top is a little shorter keels & are 2 of them I believe. But the question if the core of the newer Nova Prodisc C is any different is still unanswered as he is not familar with the Nova. But a interesting side bar is in the USA is still the original Prodisc C as the newer design is not FDA approved here only the original model that was used in the trials is being used here. It makes sense but interesting they didnt hear of the change so they cant compare the differences.

Jill
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Publication: Charite vs. Prodisc -- Facet Loading / Core Stresses Justin Arthroplasty Central 18 09-10-2007 06:01 PM
Mobile vs. Fixed Core (Semiconstrained vs constrained) Disc Designs Harrison Arthroplasty Central 2 08-22-2007 12:08 PM
Charite unstable core WILLIAM Arthroplasty Central 4 02-27-2007 02:06 AM
Research for Hard Core Plastics Geeks Harrison Arthroplasty Central 16 12-23-2005 05:07 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13