ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss Cervical ADR vs Fusion in the General Discussion forums; Will the ADRs stand the test of time? Probably a frequently argued issue. Looking for input from those who have ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-26-2009, 06:45 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default Cervical ADR vs Fusion

Will the ADRs stand the test of time?

Probably a frequently argued issue. Looking for input from those who have had cervical ADR to compare.

I am 39 with DDD C4/C5. I had a microscopic partial disc removal a few years ago with some temporary relief. It was known to be a temporizing measure at the time. My biggest complaint is numbness and weakness of the right arm. Pain with repetitive use. I am considering ADR if I can get approved.

I am leaning towards fusion. My concern is the limited devices available in the US. I am also not aware of any implanted articulating joint hardware that has lasted more than 20 years. No one seems to have a plan on what to do with these artificial discs if they need replacement in 20 years. Fusion carrys known risk of altered joint mechanics. But, it is tried and tested with known results.

Any input appreciated,
Thanks,
Hotoru
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,147
Default

No cervical ADR has existed for 20 years. Lumbar ADRs have been in existence for something like 30 years with reasonable success, given the inevitable design changes that come with experience.
__________________
Laura - L5S1 Charitee
C5/6 and 6/7 Prodisc C
Facet problems L4-S1
Knee, Shoulder, Toe, Finger, Elbow Problems

Jim - no spine problem but lots of other fun medical challenges

"There are many Annapurnas in the lives of men" Maurice Herzog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2009, 12:57 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default No exit strategy

I did not realize they had been putting in lumbar discs for 30 years. Yet, lumbar fusion remains the procedure of choice for most. I believe that cervical disc replacement has a better chance as it carries less weight (but more motion).

Some challenges still exist. Most of the newer devices are not yet approved in the US. Other artificial joints such as knees and hips wear out and have to be replaced when placed in persons under fifty. I am just surprised that know one seems to know a replacement strategy. I guess you could just remove the artifical disc and fuse later. Anyone on the forums heard of such an experience?

Hotoru
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2009, 10:41 AM
Harrison's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,228
Default Revision Surgery

Sure, we've talked about revision surgeries a zillion times! If you use the search function (above link), you'll find over 300 past discussion topics that include this term...

It's not quite 30 years now for ADR, but pretty close. In 2007, I met the first patient to ever receive an artificial disc in Germany. He received his Charite' in September of 1984 and was still doing well with the original implant. BTW, one year later it was named the "SB Charite' Modular Type Disc Prosthesis." There's a few tidbits in this article about revision procedures relative to design differences (cleat vs keel).

Hope this helps.
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston

Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default Good info

Thank you for the search information about cervical revisions. I mistaking was searching under "replacement". I am not sure if all the posts about revisions makes be feel better or worse about cervical ADRs. At least options exist for those who need.

That may be another disadvantage about having the surgery done out of country. If device is not FDA approved here than revision might not be covered either. I would suspect reluctance on surgeons to remove devices they do not place.

Hotoru
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2009, 12:39 AM
steve55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 120
Default Reply

Looks like I'll be having surgury soon to remove my c6/7 prodisc ADR and fuse. You can follow my story in the surgical outcome section. It is my understanding that fusing after ADR is not a big deal as cervical revisions are not complicated to do.
__________________
------------------------------
4/08- DDD at C5/6 & C6/7 & bulging discs. C5/6 portrusion.

6/08- Disco results- C6/7 painful, C5/6 popping sounds

7/08- Plasma disc decompression-significant relief obtained

11/08- pain returned to almost pre surgical levels

1/09 -Disco w/ Dr Ziglar shows C5/6 & C6/7 painful-2 level ADR recommended

2/26/09 - c4-c7 ADR Prodisc Nova with Dr Bertagnoli. 100% Success but need C6/7
ADR revision due to subsidence.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2009, 02:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Default

Hotoru, welcome to the club!
I'm 36 and am scheduled to have the Bryan disc in August. I know how you feel as I am concerned about long term use as well. But, I am conviced that a combination of an ADR now and whatever else 5-20+ years from now is better than a fusion now and whatever else on my other discs down the road. I'm admittedly enticed by the likelyhood of a shorter recovery time and being able to maintain motion.

I think we'll be seeing significant changes in treatment over the next 10-15 years. Traditional artificial discs will get better designs I'm sure but I'm thinking we'll see more "natural" designs that don't necessarily include metal frames like we see now. Maybe even a true artificial disc that acts exactly like a healthy disc but attaches to the vertebrae without the need for channels, screws, or other fixation. Then again, maybe I'm dreaming .
__________________
DDD C5/6. Incorrectly diagnosed as tension headaches in September 1997.
Nearly continuous headache since.
Began having pain in wrists in 2000, believed it was onset of carpal tunnel.
In 2005 pain began getting worse.
Diagnosed as DDD in July 2007.
Surgery recommended after 6weeks of PT made the pain worse.
ADR scheduled for Jan 26, 2009. Rescheduled for August 5!
Bryan disc finally FDA approved, and just in time too.
Neck was all jacked up and had to be fused unfortunately.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-05-2009, 12:09 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve55 View Post
Looks like I'll be having surgery soon to remove my c6/7 prodisc ADR and fuse.....
Thanks for the welcome. Steve, sorry to hear about need for more surgery. Let me know how it goes. Sounds like your are going back to Germany to get it fused? Is that because you want to use surgeon who placed or could not get done in states? Is insurance covering any of the costs?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
adr efficacy, adr longevity, device subsidence, disc wear, revision spine surgery, revision surgery

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cervical Revision from ADR to a Fusion - Need your help ! Melisa Arthroplasty Central 5 11-19-2007 01:53 PM
Cervical Revision from ADR to a Fusion - Need your help ! Melisa Spinal Roundtable 3 11-19-2007 12:58 PM
3 Lvl Cervical Fusion or ADR in Germany? Rod Arthroplasty Central 18 06-11-2007 05:05 PM
cervical stenosis and adr vs fusion rob_zzz Arthroplasty Central 3 03-20-2006 10:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13