ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss Maverick News in the General Discussion forums; I searched the forums to see if anyone had any news recently....I've been following it for quite some time, so ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-28-2010, 02:01 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 35
Default Maverick News

I searched the forums to see if anyone had any news recently....I've been following it for quite some time, so here's whats *REALLY* going on.

The maverick hasn't even been up for FDA consideration because of the ongoing lawsuit about the prodisc keel (ludicrous IP case, Synthes is as bad as Amazon and software patents!).

Anyhow, medtronic did not even appeal the injunction on the Maverick, or corrosponding shorter keel A-Mav. They remain barred from US Sales, though medtronic moved manufacturing to Europe some time ago, and since the prodisc patent was only filed in the US (Japan had prior art patents, so I'm not sure how it even was granted here), medtronic is free to manufacture, sell, etc the devices overseas, and seems to be content to do so.

The one bit of hope in the case was they appealed the O-Mav decision as well, since it uses 2 keels, and the US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of medtronic. Also in that case, for any business owners out there, if you decide you want to put all of your IP in a child company, make sure you set up the paperwork to show the child company grants the parent company an exclusive license to all IP, or that the child company is the only one manufacturing. Medtronic doesn't have to pay any of the damages because of this.

You can read it all yourself at http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/...rs/09-1538.pdf I have seen nothing from Medtronic nor the FDA about doing anything with the O-Mav, and medtronic claims it was developed specifically for insertion at the L4-L5 area where the aorta branches to avoid the complications that branching creates. I'm not sure if that means they feel comfortable with it at all levels, or just the L4-L5 level. I also don't know exactly what they submitted to the FDA when they revised their study with the shorter keel, was the O-Mav included? If so, getting approval, finally, should be a simple matter.

I guess this is all moot though, since I have been reading on this site that insurance companies have been paying for people to have surgery done in Germany. I myself think I am going to begin investigating this option quite soon. Perhaps by next hockey season, I can be back out on the ice!
__________________
Late 2001-2002 Original Injury - Moved Buick V-6 engine bare handed. L5-S1 Herniated
Vioxx and Cortisone injections to treat it
2007 Wanted to become more active, went to Virginia Spine Institute w/ new MRI. L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 Herniated. Sc
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
a-mav, approvals, lawsuit, maverick, o-mav, synthes medtronic law suit

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My SED - Good News, Bad News Spinal Roundtable 23 06-21-2006 11:14 AM
Good news I think!! DWebster Arthroplasty Central 17 08-12-2005 04:45 AM
Our site in ADR news... Harrison Arthroplasty Central 0 01-13-2005 11:44 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13