ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss MRI post-ADR? in the General Discussion forums; After reading much material on ADR, a question popped into my noggin' that left me a bit perplexed. I know ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:30 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 60
Default MRI post-ADR?

After reading much material on ADR, a question popped into my noggin' that left me a bit perplexed. I know that once metal has been implanted into the body the option of using MRI's is supposed to go away. That said, I seem to recall folks who have mentioned having had this diagnostic test ("the gold standard") even after going through with a disc relacement. Tt may not seem like a big deal, and may have even been mentioned somewhere around here, but I was wondering if someone can give me the cliff notes (i.e. yes/no answer)? Thanks!!

Alan
__________________
'91: Bulged L4-L5
'03: MVA = cervical whiplash
APR '07: LBP + radiculopathy = severe L5-S1 herniation
JUL '07: Micro-D
'08-'09: Reherniation @ index level, lat recess narrowing, bilat symptoms = DDD. Several MRIs & conservative treatment (accu-, PT, chiro, massage, 3XESI, etc)
SEP '09: Cervical MRI - C5-C7 bulged
OCT '09-DEC 09: loss of height & water content (L5-S1) noted. 1st mention of ADR candidacy. Denied by TRICARE.
MAR '10: Cervical MRI - C4-T1 now bulged. Enough already!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009, 11:35 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Default

Hey Alan,
I do not have an artificial disc yet. I did find an article about this:

pssjournal.com It will let you do a search without having to sign in.

"Spine imaging after Lumbar Disc Replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations"

Not a lot of info. It seems like I have seen others receive and MRI after ADR. I think I am starting to get everyone mixed up.
CD
__________________
44 yr. old female
DDD at L4-L5
low back discomfort for several years
LBP for 2 to 3 years-much worse since April '09
44 visits to chiro in 6 months
PT & ESI (failed)
Discography/CT -positive at L4-L5, annular tear & bulge
three denials from UnitedHealthcare for ADR
Surgery 2/18/10-Freedom Lumbar disc L4/L5
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009, 05:42 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,228
Default

Here's one of many topics on this from this forum:

MRI after Prestige ADR

Hope this helps...
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston

Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatonka_usn View Post
After reading much material on ADR, a question popped into my noggin' that left me a bit perplexed. I know that once metal has been implanted into the body the option of using MRI's is supposed to go away. That said, I seem to recall folks who have mentioned having had this diagnostic test ("the gold standard") even after going through with a disc relacement. Tt may not seem like a big deal, and may have even been mentioned somewhere around here, but I was wondering if someone can give me the cliff notes (i.e. yes/no answer)? Thanks!!

Alan
Harrison has provided a useful link. I would like to add that it's a common myth that you can't undergo MRI if you have metal. It's just not true. I can't believe how many doctors and patients believe this. There are a few absolute contraindications to MRI. A pacemaker is a no-no, as it will lose its programming due to the magnetic field. An intracranial (brain) aneurysm clip is almost always a no, although newer clips are MRI safe, but it must be documented. Most implantable devices (stimulators, pumps, cochlear implants) will be wiped out by the magnetic field.

Otherwise, metal only affects the quality of the images right around the area where it lies. Cardiac stents, artificial joints, surgical clips from any type of surgery, penile prostheses, gallbladder clips, etc are not reasons to avoid MRI. When in doubt, ask your local radiologist, not your treating physicians.

One other comment about that link: There is not a 1/2000 risk of brain cancer from CT scans. Research is ongoing regarding the overall increase in malignancies in large populations due to diagnostic radiation exposure. Some have preliminarily calculated the risks, and I have provided one link below. The topic cannot be simplified. The baseline incidence of malignancy in a group must be known. In addition, it is horrifically overly simplistic to say CT increases brain cancer. In the linked discussion, the posters are discussing CT myelography. In lumbar CT, there is very little radiation exposure to the head. The types of malignancies that may have very slightly increased risk will depend on what body parts the patient has had examined. Try searching "increased risk of malignancy due to diagnostic xrays" or substitute "CT" for "xrays" and read some of the links to get an idea of how complex the issue is.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0331091244.htm

-tc-
__________________
L5-S1 rupture 11/04, left leg pain for 2 wks
Regular exercise/pain-free until 2007
L5-S1 degen. disease w/constant pain since 6/07
PT, ESI, SI jt injections, 3-level nerve root inj. x 2
Massage, heat, ice, TENS, etc
L5-S1 Charite Jan. 19th, 2009, very happy w/decision
New back pain in upper back though.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 01:48 AM
ans ans is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,578
Default

TC rocks! What an answer.
__________________
Severe, extensive DDD, considered inoperable by Dr. Regan, Lauressen, & some guy at UCLA. Severe foraminal stenosis (guess they can't operate!) and some spinal cord compression that Lauryssen would fix if gets outta hand.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:55 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 60
Default

Thanks Harrison & TC. I was familiar with the concept of artifacts as a result of having implanted metal, but wasn't sure if there was an exclusion criteria for the MRI process itself. Glad to hear that it still proves useful (even to a degree) after an ADR.
__________________
'91: Bulged L4-L5
'03: MVA = cervical whiplash
APR '07: LBP + radiculopathy = severe L5-S1 herniation
JUL '07: Micro-D
'08-'09: Reherniation @ index level, lat recess narrowing, bilat symptoms = DDD. Several MRIs & conservative treatment (accu-, PT, chiro, massage, 3XESI, etc)
SEP '09: Cervical MRI - C5-C7 bulged
OCT '09-DEC 09: loss of height & water content (L5-S1) noted. 1st mention of ADR candidacy. Denied by TRICARE.
MAR '10: Cervical MRI - C4-T1 now bulged. Enough already!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13