ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Arthroplasty Central

Arthroplasty Central Discuss Unfortunate Outcome from ADR in the General Discussion forums; Patrick, I'm really sorry about your pain & outcome. I am perpexed as to what an "overworked" disc is all ...

English (US)  Español (ES)  Francais (FR)  Deutsches (DE) 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 04-30-2006, 08:49 AM
Harrison's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,228
Default

Patrick, I'm really sorry about your pain & outcome. I am perpexed as to what an "overworked" disc is all about -- and it's come up here -- at least in those terms. If you could elaborate on your understanding of this, that would be helpful.
E.g., is the artificial disc in good shape?
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston

Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-30-2006, 05:34 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Sorry about my description of this overworked artificial disc, it is a bit confusing as I read it again. I think what my doctor was stating was that I had overworked the whole lower lumbar area of my spine. The artificial disc is actually stronger than the rest of the very unstable area in my low back. Because of the added stress I was putting on my low back trying to act "normal", when I am not, something had to give and it was my SI joint. My doctor told me several people in the Kineflex/Charite study that had L4-5 replaced who have been exceeding their physical limitations, have had their SI joint give out. I don't know if it made any difference whether it was the Kineflex or the Charite. For the record, I have the Charite and it is in good shape. I hope this makes more sense.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-30-2006, 08:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 314
Default

I have stated this before and my theory is that all of the surrounding structures are put under tremendous stress in having to deal with a bad disc, so they overcompensate, they get worn out and weakened... they are subjected to perform in ways they were not designed to do, after ADR those areas are still weak and need time to recover, they need to be strengthened, after ADR they are once again traumatized because of the "new positioning" being positioned back where they are suppose to be requires them to re-adapt and recover.
__________________
Charite @ L5,S1. W/Zeegers
March 11, 05. Successful.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-01-2006, 04:04 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 442
Default

My physical therapist and several other 'side members' of the medical personnel I've dealt with (radiologists, pain-management specialists) seem to go with with your theory, Laura. I tend to agree as well.

However, one radiologist took it a step further and told me after looking at my MRIs that 'the body finds a sort of stability in instability' and I should therefore not risk making things worse by more spine surgery. 'Let your body work it out for itself; I've never seen a patient whose body has not learned to cope and compensate on its own with time, even if things will never be perfect'.

My NS didn't appreciate his opinion, but I don't think I can translate the language without getting censured by the boss

At any rate, my physical therapist feels that when the spine is off-kilter for any reason and with or without ADR, the whole thing must be gently worked on to help strengthen and stabilize as much as possible. This too goes against what some doctors feel, so I think the best we can do is trial and error (but error hurts big time here).

Trace
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-01-2006, 07:51 PM
ans ans is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,578
Default

Carmont:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retri...&itool=pubmed_docsum
__________________
Severe, extensive DDD, considered inoperable by Dr. Regan, Lauressen, & some guy at UCLA. Severe foraminal stenosis (guess they can't operate!) and some spinal cord compression that Lauryssen would fix if gets outta hand.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cervical vs. Lumbar Outcome Ray R Arthroplasty Central 4 04-24-2007 11:40 AM
Dynesys Outcome, Please go*big*red Spinal Roundtable 3 06-22-2006 09:49 AM
Variables affecting outcome ADR in the USA Arthroplasty Central 2 06-15-2006 01:44 PM
Very interesting outcome! go*big*red Arthroplasty Central 39 10-16-2005 04:46 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2009 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13