View Single Post
  #20  
Old 08-19-2016, 03:00 PM
nasakido's Avatar
nasakido nasakido is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 127
Default M6 or not

I received a response from Dr. Zeegers after sending him the referenced document / marketing of the M6 disc. Before I post his response I wanted to add that I completely agree with his initial assessment as I too have concluded what he asserts. The M6 is not a bad disc, it is just not superior to other choices out there. It appears that Dr. Zeegers really likes the Activ-L. But, there is the LP-ESP, the Freedom and the Baguera-L that are excellent choices as well.

"
HAVE TO STUDY all 64 pages pdf doc, but in a glimpse i do not see any superiority of M6L over Activ L
- the so called compression=damping effect has never been proved as significant.
- cannot find really custom sizes of M6 implant, 2 sizes medium 35mm W x 27mm and large 39x30 only! (undersizing risk !)
- no special M6 implant design for L5S1 (remnant L5S1 problems !)
- the instrumentation tools from M6 are absolutely inferior to Activ L (no oblique approach, no reliable revision tools)
+ for example see superior size offer in Activ L discs in brochure pdf
+ for example see superior instrumentation offer in Activ L brochure pdf
regards zeegers
"

Regards,
Nathan

Note: This hour of suffering... Part 32 - The End in Sight
__________________
Injury 31-7-14
MRI w/o con. 30-8-14
RT L5-S1 Discectomy w/ RT S1 Foraminotomy 21-11-14
PT (50) 20-8-14 to 04-24-15
MRI w/ con 13-4-15
XR Pelvis 08-6-15
COR INJ 02-7-15
MRI 14-11-15
Discography w/ CT-Scan 19-1-16
QME 16-2-16
XR LL 29-4-16
Bone Density (DEXA) Scan 01-8-16
XR LL 01-8-16
Metal-LTT 12-8-16
MRI 17-8-16
EKG 21-10-16
2-LVL L4-S1 ADR LP-ESP 08-11-16
XR LL 24-11-16
A-THX (24) 12-12-16 to 24-02-17
XR LL 31-01-17
XR LL 08-5-17
CT-Scan 07-6-17
Reply With Quote