View Single Post
  #5  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:00 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,010
Default

The testing question is simple, but the answer is not! E.g., this seven-year-old FDA bulletin on Lyme testing is quite misleading, as it points to a CDC test method that was designed for surveillance – not diagnostics. This crappy test often leads to false negatives, as it only tests a small number of “biomarkers” of the Lyme bug:

http://www.fda.gov/medbull/summer99/Lyme.html

If you are curious about the accuracy of the test, join the club. But to be fair, it’s a tricky test. For example, try this search and check out the results – there are many reasons why a patient’s results could be seronegative:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=reasons+for+lyme+s...y&btnG=Google+ Search

Again, most hospitals and clinics use this cheap, easy and crappy test. It’s hard to believe, but it’s the norm. At least in Taxachusetts.

There are some good labs out there, ones that test for an accurate number of Borrellia markers (Lyme bacteria) as well as other bacterial co-infections. Here’s one in CA (click on Lyme disease):

http://www.igenex.com/

Hope this helps.
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston
Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Donate www.arthropatient.org/about/donate
Reply With Quote