View Single Post
  #3  
Old 07-15-2014, 10:52 AM
drewrad drewrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 629
Default

They're both good ADR. Dr Clavel had both on deck but wanted to reaffirm my bone density. Said bones, once inside, were good, but confirmed also with another DEXA. I could have gone with either ADR, but ranked M6 higher last minute in my case due to blood metal allergy test which may not have been an issue at all but why risk? Nickel was reactive as well as chromium coming up close to reactive. And no articulation thus wear debris. That said Activ L is fantastic with excellent results.

As far as revision for M6, Clavel said they were easy for him. Bierstedt said same thing. Clavel told me revision tools for M6 make it pretty straight forward.
__________________
Weightlifter since 12 years old, now mid-40's and figuring out this wasn't such a good idea.

Chronic back pain started in 2010 while shrugging weights that a 40 yr. old shouldn't even try.

MRI in 2012 showing L4/L5, L5/S1 herniations and L2/L3 bulge.

L5/S1 taking on new shape, chronic sciatica, etc.

DEXA bone scan performed 5/7/14 showing mild osteopenia.

Surgery performed July 9th, 2014, Dr Clavel, hybrid three level lumbar.
Reply With Quote