View Single Post
  #2  
Old 10-10-2005, 12:40 PM
luvmysibe luvmysibe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 556
Default

Welcome Gillian,
My age - 35 - was a factor in my selection of ADR rather than fusion. Prior to my injury, I lived a very active life. My desire was to keep as much flexibility and motion as possible post-surgery; therefor, I chose ADR over fusion. The materials used in the devices is similar to artificial knees and hips which have been implanted for several decades. My view towards a possible future surgery was that I wanted the highest quality of life for as long as possible. If it meant that in 30 years I might need a fusion, so be it. However, at the rate of medical technology, by the time another surgery could possibly be needed the procedure could be quite advanced and fusion not required.

Best wishes with your journey
__________________
Crystal
L5/SI Charite
7/18/05 Dr. Howard
http://www.myspace.com/luvmysibe
http://www.xanga.com/luvmysibe
"A smile is contagious, be a carrier ."
Reply With Quote