Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison
Why not go with a Euro surgeon? Of course, you can and may have good results. My argument has been consistent: you can achieve similar outcomes with the same or less money stateside. And avoid the agonizing travel and lack of follow-up care. If things get really bad post-operatively, you have no legal tools to employ for Euro-docs -- and I mean none. The Germans in particular make it impossible for patients to sue for malpractice.
Some Euro docs even try to sell "extra" insurance if there are complications, and some patients in this community have purchased it. I find that really unscrupulous, but that's just my opinion. Some of the Euro docs are getting between $60,000 - 120,000 for spine surgeries in cash.
|
I assume you meant "Why go with a Euro surgeon"? Not "Why not go with..."
The answer is simple: The doctors near me, at least one of whom is very accomplished, only use the ProDisc-L. I know you are anti-M6, and I understand your reasons, but theory aside (I think in theory the M6 seems like a better design, and I think you think it is too complicated and may have problems down the road), there are a couple proven points. I know one can take issue with these and say the studies were too small, the doctors weren't the best, etc. I am familiar with the issues with experimental design and all too aware that it is done very poorly in many medical studies. But still, the data I have, high quality or not, is that:
The M6 has a slightly faster recovering time that the ProDisc-L and another disc to which is was compared, I believe is has been shown to reduce adjacent level problems as compared to "hard" discs, and I know hard/unconstrained discs have been show to have a higher frequency of pedicle and facet fractures (which only makes sense as those structures then become the "hard stops" for twisting motions.
That's on top of lesser issues such as the particles that the MoP and MoM are known to produce (and which have been shown, at least histologically, to be inflammatory -- that issue might not rise to clinical significance), and that I believe the ProDisc-L is chromium steel, while the M6 is titanium -- which I suspect gives the M6 a slightly lesser change of allergic reactions. But again, these are tiny points compared to the fact that I fear eventually damage to adjacent levels and facets joints more with a MoP or MoM disc than a viscoelastic disc with graduated resistance.
I'd be happy to hear why I'm wrong. If I go with a ProDisc I have to travel 12 miles via Uber, as opposed to a flight of 1000+ miles. But, while the travel and expense are very unattractive, so is having a second rate disc in me for a few decades. I really wish I didn't feel that way. I'd go to Cedars Sinai tomorrow and get a ProDisc, but I just can't wrap my head around that making sense.