For me, I have chosen ADR over fusion for several reasons:
1. Range of movement: A two level fusion would seriously restrict my range of movement, while a two level ADR would not.
2. Recovery time: Generally speaking, the recovery time of ADR is significantly less (and better) than fusion.
3. Age: Since I am 34, the last thing I want to do is fuse two levels in my lumbar spine. I used to be a fairly active person, but I haven't been active in over a year, and would prefer to return to an active lifestyle. In my opinion, I have a much better chance of returning to a fairly active lifestyle with a two level ADR versus a two level fusion.
4. Quality of life: In my opinion, the quality of life for ADR patients in the long run is better than the quality of life for fusion patients.
David
__________________
47 years old
Surgery: 14-NOV-2006; Straubing, Germany (Dr. B.)
L4-S1: Prodisc
|