ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > The Cutting Edge

The Cutting Edge Find authoritative insights from medical professionals, manufacturers, and guest visitors. Also find a current list of clinical trials. This is a read-only forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-02-2019, 09:31 AM
Cheryl0331 Cheryl0331 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 689
Default Comparison of new devices to the M6

I will have to take a look at this on the computer vs on my phone, but I want to see end plate size comparisons between the M6 and others.
Having the option with any particular surgeon to use a disc replacement that offers a bigger end plate coverage than another is important. There are so many factors to consider when choosing an ADR, but to me it's knowing your surgeon has options and is not bound to one particular device.
__________________
52 yr old 5ft.7in. 139 lbs. non-smoker conservative treatments failed
2007 fusion C4-6 w/peek implants plate & screws, failed due to long term use of cox-2 inhibitor
2008 revised w/donor bone replace plate & screws
2009 fusion Roi-C C3-4
2015 MRI & CT shows incomplete fusion, significant central canal narrows C3-4, mild posterior spurs C4-6, major ddd C6-7, segmental kyphosis at C7-T1 2-level ADR with Dr. Clavel
2019 some degeneration C2-3, HO behind ADR C6-7.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quote comparison from Dr. Clavel bwink23 International Assistance 19 02-12-2014 08:30 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


© Copyright 2006-2017 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.