ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > New Member Introductions

New Member Introductions If you just joined, please introduce yourself here. Please add a signature describing your spinal history (use the "User CP) and ask us how we can help you get started.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 04-20-2011, 12:49 PM
tnt136913 tnt136913 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 44
Default texas back

i am getting a L3 L4 alif fusion from TBI any day , they told me tthe new m6 disc is 21.000 just for the disc
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-20-2011, 01:04 PM
banhorn's Avatar
banhorn banhorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 94
Default

Hi John,

The tax thing is great to know... if I ever elect to get something done out of the country. It's working up to getting something done that is the tough part, eh? I just read some of Harrison's info on biofilms - now I'm even more iffy about getting something like an ADR done. LOL I knew infections were a risk, but those biofilms sound horrible!

As for pain, I don't know that mine is even a 1/4 compared to what most of the people on here are going through. I'm ok off pain killers as long as I don't bend and twist too much and take breaks every hour or so from sitting. It's just the tingles and numbness that are scaring me. Quite honestly, I feel selfish for even looking into ADR when I read about some of the problems some other unfortunate people are going through on these boards. I'm just trying to play with my kid(s) and do some sports again and I'm not entirely sure ADR will even do the trick for that. OR if the benefits outweigh the risks.

I pinged TBI to get an opinion as per your recco and JSS'. Like Jstuckey, I'm pretty set on Mr. Boeree if I go for surgery. Clavel was awesome too, but Boeree was a little cheaper and exceptionally responsive/compassionate. They are both eminently qualified as far as I'm concerned. I also love going to London! Can't beat the local brews.

As a side note, I requested a copy of my last bone scan, because I assume they show densities... am I correct? I want to make absolutely sure my bones are up to the task should I choose to ADR it up. For any of you on the other side, did you bother going through metal allergy tests beforehand? I'd like to have all my ducks in a row if I'm going to make a move.

Thanks again for all the insight, guys.
__________________
July 2011 - L4/5 M6-L, Courtesy of Mr. Nick Boeree
http://backup.muellhorn.ca

Last edited by banhorn; 04-20-2011 at 02:51 PM. Reason: spelling errors
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-20-2011, 03:17 PM
DAnn's Avatar
DAnn DAnn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 73
Default Tx back and Mr Boerre

I still need to post my experience with surgery and recovery. Doing pretty well so far after a week out. I am probably doing a little more than I should, but feeling pretty good overall. Just some muscle pain between my shoulder blades and in my shoulders, which is normal and should go away with time, and it is already getting better.

I had a hybrid fusion/ADR at c6/7 c5/6 performed by Dr Blumenthal at tx back.I am quite happy with my choice of surgeon, and the hospital staff was wonderful.

Also, I wanted to chime in that I spoke with Mr Boeree and he was very helpful (the only other opinion that confirmed my Dr.s opinion, so he really helped put my mind at ease).

He is a delightful person, and I am sure he is a wonderful surgeon. The factors that Led me to decide to go with tx back were the skill of my surgeon, that i would likely end up with a hybrid in England as well, and the issue of follow up care (and the fact that insurance would cover my tx procedure and timing was an issue as my quality of life was becoming quite low).

You should be in good hands if you decide to go the Boeree route though.

DAnn
__________________
DAnn
DDD/Cervical Stenosis
September 2010 MRI showed:
C6-7 disc moderately to markedly narrowed, mild retrolisthesis of c6 on c7 producing effacement of the thecal sac but no cord impingement, mild narrowing of left neural foramen;
c5-6 disc moderately narrowed, anterior and posterior disc bulge with mild anterior cord impingement;
c4-5 disc intact and normal height, potential posterior annular fissure.
Cervical hybrid surgery in Texas April 12, 2011, fusion at C6/7, Prodisc C at C5/6
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-28-2011, 02:19 PM
banhorn's Avatar
banhorn banhorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 94
Default

I've been reading more about the severing of the Anterior Ligament during ADR. Is this something they attempt to re-attach, or is it severed permanently During the Op? I've read that this can contribute to a lot of spinal instability?
__________________
July 2011 - L4/5 M6-L, Courtesy of Mr. Nick Boeree
http://backup.muellhorn.ca
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-28-2011, 03:41 PM
Jstuckey's Avatar
Jstuckey Jstuckey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 305
Default

Good question for the surgeon. I'll ask myself. Here's an internet picture of what they are talking about. I'm guessing they don't/can't reattach
__________________
Joey Sue - 50 years old
9/28/2011: Hybrid STALIF TT interbody fusion at L5-S1 and M6-L ADR L4-5 with Nick Boeree, UK - forever grateful to you Nick! Still doing great.
Prior to the fix: Severe DDD L4-5 and L5-S1 with moderate facet degen at L5-S1, but only mild facet degeneration at L4-5.
http://healthyback2011.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-28-2011, 08:17 PM
Hooch Hooch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 194
Default

No it can't be reattached, it's just one of the downsides of adr and is in all likelihood a contributor to facet problems.

The bottom line is the outcomes from a correctly indicated adr are generally better than a fusion.
__________________
Dec 2010 L4/L5 M6 L5/S1 ALIF
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:47 PM
banhorn's Avatar
banhorn banhorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 94
Default

I just spoke with Mr. Boeree about the ALL and this is what he said (from memory so I might be a little off):

The ALL is divided to implant the device and no effort is usually made to fix it, because it would just turn into scar tissue with no benefit to the rest of the spine. This was an issue in older generation devices as they were unconstrained, so they had to keep part of the original annulus in place to prevent pop-outs of the prodisc and charite in extreme extension. The artificial annulus of the M6 lessens the importance of the ALL and flexion/extension are not an issue.

My Take: He didn't think it would destabilize the spine at ALL (bad pun), though he did offer to stitch it up for me if I would prefer! Again, it just becomes a bunch of scar tissue with no elasticity.
__________________
July 2011 - L4/5 M6-L, Courtesy of Mr. Nick Boeree
http://backup.muellhorn.ca
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-05-2011, 07:01 PM
Jstuckey's Avatar
Jstuckey Jstuckey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 305
Default

Thanks for sharing! Makes much sense!
__________________
Joey Sue - 50 years old
9/28/2011: Hybrid STALIF TT interbody fusion at L5-S1 and M6-L ADR L4-5 with Nick Boeree, UK - forever grateful to you Nick! Still doing great.
Prior to the fix: Severe DDD L4-5 and L5-S1 with moderate facet degen at L5-S1, but only mild facet degeneration at L4-5.
http://healthyback2011.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:50 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,010
Exclamation

Banhorn, I really don't know what to make of your comment about the surgeon's politeness:
"...though he did offer to stitch it up for me if I would prefer!.."
It's interesting, perhaps odd, that we patients are literally getting into the bowels of surgical details with doctors.

I have noticed through the years and various conversations with patients and doctors that there are myriad differences in surgical techniques; some of these matter greatly in terms of mfr.s' compliance to "proper" implantation of devices. Other techniques may not be taught in school, or in product training, but surgeons develop many refinements over the years. We hear bits and pieces of these refinements here, from doctors, from sales reps or spine brokers.

Ultimately, we have to like and trust the doctor who will perform a very invasive procedure on our bodies. It helps if we also "believe' that the device is the best in terms of design and ease of implantation. I still don't like keeled designs, but it doesn't matter what I think...

What's the latest results on your DEXA scan T scores Banhorn? If your T scores are not optimal, it may be wise to steer away from a keeled design -- or even cleated.

Do tell!
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston
Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Donate www.arthropatient.org/about/donate
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-08-2011, 05:33 AM
Hooch Hooch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 194
Default

That's very funny, I'm sure he was having a bit of a lend.
__________________
Dec 2010 L4/L5 M6 L5/S1 ALIF
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bone density, dexa scan, lumbar artificial disc replacement, spinal arthroplasty

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.


© Copyright 2006-2023 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.