ADRSupport Community  

Go Back   ADRSupport Community > General Discussion > Insurance Hell

Insurance Hell All insurance-related matters are here: Medicare, worker's compensation, appeals, denials, insights, wins, losses. PRICING is here too. Note: This forum has posts from 2006 forward. Older ones are in the Big File.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-12-2008, 01:32 PM
Sandra L Sandra L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 111
Question 3-level cervical in 2004 w/Dr. Delamarter?

I copied some posts (check below) from the following thread in 2005. http://www.adrsupport.org/forums/showthread.php?t=7827 Part of it pertains to cervical ADR and paulam310 a senior member getting a BC PPO to pay for his surgery. Dr. Delamarter at St.John's, Santa Monica, performed the 3-level 4 yrs ago


I haven't been able to find other posts that explain this. Does Delamarter have special powers, how is this possible? Do insurance companies pay for surgeries before they are FDA approved under "research"?

When I contacted Dr. Delamarter's office in January, 2008, I was told that he could do a 3-level. Had to call the business department for a quote, $140,000 +or - , plus travel and accommodations from Ohio/Calif (the Dr. and device prices had been set, but the hospital hadn't finalized their costs). Also told probably couldn't get insurance coverage since ProDisc-C was only FDA approved for 1 level. I'm on Medicare and BC/BC Anthem as secondary. I had no choice but to choose Germany. Am glad since after discogram it was determined I needed 4-levels. Surgery in Germany cost approx 42,000 Euro's or $67,000 (bad exchange rate of 1.55+ in March 2008) not including travel and accommodations.

Can anyone explain why paulam was able to get coverage way back in 2004 and how could he have gotten a 3-level cervical at that time? There are some 3-level cervicals being done today in Seattle and Santa Monica, with special approvals from FDA. I don't understand? His last post was in April, 2004. Has anyone PM'd him to find out how he is after 4 years. Harrison, is this something you could check for us multiple cervies?

Read today's new threads about cervical costs.
Quote:
My two-level was around $52,000 Seems a little light on the cervical section. Dave
I agree since the quote I got for 3 with Delamarter was much higher. Maybe with more doing the surgery the lower the price? free market working?

Sandy

Quote:

04-29-2005, 12:22 AM
paulam310
Senior Member

I received a 3 level adr 12-7-04, Blue Cross PPO approved me without question. I didn't realize that insurance companies were not approving; I feel like it's awful not to approve such surgeries. Keep fighting 'till you get what you need!
__________________
3 level prodisc C4-5,C5-6,C6-7
12-04

let me try and clarify my surgeries and insurance. I received a diskectomy from Dr. Lauryssen 11-03 at C6. Then I received a 3 level prodisc from Dr. Delamarter 12-04 at C4-7. PPO stands for participating provider organization. I bought the insurance myself as a self-employed person. My first surgery was at Cedars and the second one was at St. John's, both in L.A. which is where I live. Since the prodisc is still in a trial all the discs were free, I believe that is the rule until the FDA approves the disc. Hope that answers all your questions. 05-01-2005, 06:20 PM


I received a 3 level cervical prodisc 12-04. I was the third person in the US to receive it. 05-06-2005, 02:10 AM

Last edited by Sandra L; 12-12-2008 at 01:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2008, 02:56 PM
ZorroSF ZorroSF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 303
Default

Well in 2004 I don't think this surgery was FDA approved, so Delamarter's office could've been doing it for free. Typically what happens is the doctor's office tries to approve the surgery with your insurance. SInce the procedure isn't typcially covered by the insurance company the manufacturer of the device will end up paying the doctor and the hospital, thereby making the surgery free. This only applies to FDA trials.

Of course, in 2004 the known issues with Charitie gaming the FDA trials hadn't been discovered or at least advertised. The insurance company could've really been covering this surgery for a small period of time until they realized the cost risks.



Delamarter is the last free doctor in LA. In fact he doesn't accept insurance at all. He takes your cash and bills your insurance later. Your insurance company will reimburse you whatever they feel like. Not a situation to be in if you're not rich. Another popular person, Dr. Regan, does the same.
__________________
***********************
1/2006 DDD L5/S1

Prodisc St. Mary's 12/2006 not diagnosed properly pre-op and now have DDD L4/L5, facet calcification L5-S1/L4-L5, mild scoliosis and left knee pain. DDD: C3 through C6
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2008, 07:38 PM
Sandra L Sandra L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 111
Default prodisc-c and insurance

Quote:
The insurance company could've really been covering this surgery for a small period of time until they realized the cost risks.
Makes sense. But a 3-level wasn't part of the protocol in the trials, don't know whether the FDA lets a doctor go outside the trial rules. Delamarter must have a "friend." There are lots of wealthy people around LA so guess he can charge what the market will bear.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2008, 05:40 PM
KBear's Avatar
KBear KBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZorroSF View Post
Of course, in 2004 the known issues with Charitie gaming the FDA trials hadn't been discovered or at least advertised.
Huh? Can you fill me in on what you are referring to? I read an old article on here not to long ago, that referred to the Pro-Disc trials possibly being skewed. Just curious if you are referring to something similar. Thanks, Kathy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2008, 10:58 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,010
Default

Zorro, there are many perspectives on the overall design of the Charite clinical trial. I've heard many from patients (here), patients (phone) and of course from papers and at conferences.

My opinion is that for properly qualified patients, ADR is a good option. The qualification process continues to be the weakest link in the process. And that may have been a big part challenge in the original clinical design. If you really do your homework, you will see that (published) clinical design criteria is getting more careful; more detailed; more stringent. I think is a good thing, though some people may be disappointed to be disqualified from a trial.

Dr. Geisler published this interesting paper which provides a more analytical assessment of the Charité trial data than what was previously published. It's a bit technical, now old news, but read it carefully. I'll send it to you -- just email me (not private message).

Surgical Treatment for Discogenic Low-Back Pain:
Lumbar Arthroplasty Results in Superior Pain Reduction
and Disability Level Improvement Compared With Lumbar Fusion
Fred H. Geisler, MD, PhD
__________________
"Harrison" - info (at) adrsupport.org
Fell on my ***winter 2003, Canceled fusion April 6 2004
Reborn June 25th, 2004, L5-S1 ADR Charite in Boston
Founder & moderator of ADRSupport - 2004
Founder Arthroplasty Patient Foundation a 501(c)(3) - 2006
Creator & producer, Why Am I Still Sick? - 2012
Donate www.arthropatient.org/about/donate
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2009, 02:22 AM
Toebin's Avatar
Toebin Toebin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandra L View Post
I haven't been able to find other posts that explain this. Does Delamarter have special powers, how is this possible? Do insurance companies pay for surgeries before they are FDA approved under "research"?



Can anyone explain why paulam was able to get coverage way back in 2004 and how could he have gotten a 3-level cervical at that time?


Sandy
Sandy,

I was part of a clinical trial out of Delemarter's medical practice although with a different surgeon. Perhaps the person you referred to was part of a clinical trial as well? If that is the case then insurance would be billed as they would for a standard fusion, and the actual ADR device would be paid for as part of the trial. That's how it worked in my case at least. I ended up with a fusion anyways so it was covered like any other surgery. But had I been randomized for the ADR's my insurance would not have seen any different costs... it would have been absorbed through the trial itself.

I got insurance approval without any issues...
__________________
Hyperparathyroidism-CURED! Aug08, lets see if I can grow bone now!
DDD for as long as I can remember.
Myofacial Pain Disease
Severe Vitamin D Deficiency
Spinal Fusion C5-C6, C6-C7 - May 2007
Multiple epidurals, L 3/4/5 & S1
L 3,4,5 & S1 herniated/bulging disks-under control for now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2009, 12:57 PM
Sandra L Sandra L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 111
Default later trials have more rigid parameters?

I think I understand what you are saying. In early trials, multiple levels were done and submitted to the insurance company as fusion with cost of device, instruments, etc. paid by the manufactuer. Then after those trials, the FDA didn't approve??? So later trials were set up with tighter parameters, no multiples? Once the devices are "approved" by the FDA the doctors can't bill the insurance company for a fusion and let you pay for the devices as was possible in the trials?

I don't understand why insurance companies are not forced to pay for FDA approvals by the government. I understand why they don't want to pay -$$$. But what would be so wrong with their paying the amount that would be charged for a fusion and the patient paying for the extras. Both surgeries should be close to the same amount, except for the cost of the implants.

Sandy
__________________
**Accidents, active life-style, always some back/neck pain controlled w/ibuphrofen
2004 excessive pain, x-ray, PT, MRI diagnosis cervical DDD
**PM recommended, meds, PT, massage therapy, chiropractor, injections
**Dec. 2007 numbness and weakness in left arm/thumb, x-rays, MRI, discs at C4-7 pushing on spinal cord, fusion or ADR out of country
**April 7, 2008, discogram at C3-4, surgery 4 levels, Prodisc-C, Dr. Bertagnoli, Germany
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2009, 03:20 PM
Toebin's Avatar
Toebin Toebin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 193
Default

Believe me I understand the confusion your feeling. ADR's are (for the right patient) the single best option for repair of the spine and yet an insurance company can dictate the type of medical treatment the patient will be provided. It's nuts !

Quote:
In early trials, multiple levels were done and submitted to the insurance company as fusion with cost of device, instruments, etc. paid by the manufactuer. Then after those trials, the FDA didn't approve???
The early trials were for a particular manufacturer's device.. FDA approval was pending for that device and other manufacturer's devices started their own trials.

Quote:
So later trials were set up with tighter parameters, no multiples? Once the devices are "approved" by the FDA the doctors can't bill the insurance company for a fusion and let you pay for the devices as was possible in the trials?
Later trials were by other manufacturers.... and they all set their own criteria for patient acceptance. My clinical trial was for the Mobi-C and that trial definitely looked at 2 level ADR replacement, that's why they wanted me in the study as I had 2 levels that were shot.

As far as insurance approval went (for me) as part of the trial.... the only thing the doctors submitted for was a 2 level fusion (standard repair-nothing fancy) and my insurance approved the surgery very quickly. My trial was randomized, I didn't know when I was being put under what type of repair I had been randomized for... Once I woke up from the anesthesia I was told they had done a 2 level fusion, as that was what I was randomized for (randomization is done by an outside company, even the MD isn't notified until the patient is in the OR).

Had I gotten the ADR's the insurance company would still only have been billed for the surgical time and it's my understanding that it would have been less money for them in that event because the ADR's take less time to perform.

Working under the investigational device that clinical trials are done with, gives a bit of leeway on how they can be billed due to the randomization that is required. Once there is FDA approval, then the procedure that is done has it's own billing code and is defined differently. At that point my understanding is yes, the insurance company can "choose" to deny payment for that procedure... when there is another procedure that will fix the problem with similar outcomes.

In reading the boards here , what I have seen, are those that have gotten insurance approval have done so based on the cost of the original procedure done AND being able to show the cost of ADR placement being less usually due to less hospital time required post op for many patients. And the actual procedure time being less in many cases.

Keep in mind, insurance companies are all about the costs... it has nothing to do with the quality of the procedure or the long term outcome for the patient. Sadly enough

Medical implants are a huge issue (cost) for insurance companies. Working in health care as I did I had a little dealing with the billing aspects of these. And the negotiations that went in to devices (Hips, ankles, knees) between hospitals and insurance companies were hotly contested events.

It also appears (and I'm no expert by any means) that the insurance companies have had time with ADR's (TDR's) to get their ducks in a row. ALL of them seem to have the same policy on the devices.
__________________
Hyperparathyroidism-CURED! Aug08, lets see if I can grow bone now!
DDD for as long as I can remember.
Myofacial Pain Disease
Severe Vitamin D Deficiency
Spinal Fusion C5-C6, C6-C7 - May 2007
Multiple epidurals, L 3/4/5 & S1
L 3,4,5 & S1 herniated/bulging disks-under control for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.


© Copyright 2006-2023 ADRSupport.org All rights reserved.