|
The Big File All issues not easily categorized in the above forums are here. Comments on general health, diet, "getting comfortable," and more are here. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Medicare has finally approved coverage for lumbar charite--for patients under the age of 60. A huge development.
http://yahoo.reuters.com/stocks/QuoteCompanyNewsArticle...ymbol=SYST.VX8rpc=44
__________________
2001 MVA; C5-C6 disk extruded ongoing physical therapy, exercise and massage ESI's, oral prednisone, trigger point injections foraminal and central stenosis C5/C6 and c6/C7 2007 EMG/nerve conduction shows pattern of chronic radiculopathy January, 2008: Prestige ST Artificial Disk Replacement, C5/6 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
From the CMS website...not exactly a straight up approval of Charite for those under 60 but at least it's not a flat out denial either. I would love to test my local SSD office except that I was told that they are 2 yrs behind schedule hearing appeals!
SUBJECT: Coverage Decision Memorandum for Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement DATE: May 16, 2006 I. Decision The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has found that lumbar artificial disc replacement (LADR) with the Charite lumbar artificial disc is not reasonable and necessary for the Medicare population over sixty years of age. Therefore, we are issuing a national noncoverage determination for LADR with the Charite lumbar artificial disc for the Medicare population over sixty years of age. For Medicare beneficiaries sixty years of age and under, there is no national coverage determination, leaving such determinations to be made on a local basis. *** Conclusions Chronic back pain from degenerative disc disease is complex and can be difficult to treat. Current surgical treatment modalities are controversial. After thoroughly reviewing the existing data for LADR with the Charite lumbar artificial disc, important questions remain regarding patient selection, adverse events, and long term outcomes. The Charite PMA trial was limited to patient ages 18 to 60 years old, excluding the age group with the highest prevalence of degenerative disc disease. Due to the lack of evidence of benefit for those Medicare beneficiaries over the age of 60, CMS will noncover LADR with the Charite lumbar artificial disc in this population. Some evidence does exist for patients 60 years of age and under, though the results of the Charite PMA noninferiority trial are unconvincing as an adequate demonstration of health benefit and do not provide a sufficient basis for a NCD at this time. The Charite studies without a comparison group make it difficult to draw clear conclusions on the benefit of treatment, though some individual patients with this complex, potentially disabling problem may benefit. This makes it difficult for CMS to arrive at an appropriate conclusion as to whether this device is reasonable and necessary for the 60 years of age and under Medicare beneficiary. In our proposed decision memorandum released on February 15, 2006, CMS proposed noncoverage for all Medicare beneficiaries. In consideration of the difficulty in arriving at a clear conclusion of the benefit of this technology for the 60 years of age and under population, along with the strong opinion from the public about the complicated nature of appropriate patient selection and the need for some limited coverage, we are changing our proposed decision and removing the national noncoverage for this segment of the Medicare population. Therefore, for Medicare beneficiaries 60 years of age and under, we will continue current coverage at this time. There is clearly a tremendous need for additional research on the treatment of degenerative disc disease to include the technology addressed in the NCD—the lumbar artificial disc—and other surgical procedures to include spinal fusion. Therefore, CMS will also convene a Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee at the earliest possible time to address the issue of spinal surgery for degenerative disc disease. We urge the spinal surgery community to discuss the current limitations of the evidence for benefit and to outline the steps needed to develop better evidence. CMS is aware that there are several other disc technologies in FDA investigational device exemption clinical trials in the United States. As previously stated, CMS is evaluating LADR with a focus on the Charite lumbar artificial disc in this analysis, since this was the only disc implant that had FDA approval at this time. However, we anticipate that when other lumbar spinal disc implants receive approval from the FDA that CMS will, by external request or internal direction, open this NCD for reconsideration with a thorough review of the evidence for each new disc implant. Since this NCD focuses on LADR with the Charite lumbar artificial disc, Medicare coverage under the investigational device exemption (IDE) for other lumbar artificial discs in eligible clinical trials is not impacted.
__________________
Injured 9/01 Annular tears L4/5 & L5/S1 denied adr by insurance for 2 level charite as well as hybrid fusion at L5/S1 with Charite at L4/5. New ins paid for 2 level lumbar prodisc surgery on 4/7/08 (at age 39) with Dr. Westerlund, at Core Orthop |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NIce to see good news for a change! At least Medicare does recognize that this could benefit their subscribers under the age of 60 and I hope that this is the first step to getting better coverage from the private sector in paying for the device and the procedure!
__________________
Kim Herniated disc L5/S1 2000 Discectomy 10/2003 Rhizotomy 8/2004 and 3/2005Discogram 11/04 grade 7 tear L5/S1 L4/L5 Grade 5 tear with herniation and stenosis Evaluated by Dr Blumenthal at TBI 2/2005 ADR 2 level recommended 2 level lumbar fusion |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This is good news, altho because I've WC coverage, Medicare doesn't cover anything for my low back~ but it's good to know that it may cover this for others.
Hopefully MC will eventually go on a case by case coverage for those over 60 who may be in better physical health than some under 60! It's a start~ thanks Barbara for posting this~ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I think this is great news for Medicare beneficiaries under 60, and maybe even over 60. They are leaving the door open, which to me is interpreted that they don't want to admit that they were wrong. It's like a person/company who is being sued, and settles but denies any wrongdoing.
Unfortunately for me I had a lumbar fusion 3 months ago so I am not helped by this unless the level above herniates and then I will insist on a disk one level above! LBP Thanks for posting this!
__________________
slipped/fell on ice cream May 2002 in hospital lobby 7 epidural shots lumbar & cervical Blood clot Nov. 03 Discectomy L5-S1, 6/04 Delamarter Candidate ADR L-5-S1 & 2 level C-3-4,5-6 Medicare because of sarcoidosis - Awating Medicare to pay for ADR's |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Medicare coverage for ADR? | betsyb2 | Insurance Hell | 30 | 08-11-2009 08:00 PM |
Medicare Proposes No Coverage for Spinal Discs in over 60`s | Alastair | Insurance Hell | 0 | 06-11-2007 01:39 PM |
another article about Charite and Medicare (Prodisc also mentioned) | David | The Big File | 1 | 03-18-2006 09:13 AM |
Medicare-Medicaid Coverage on ADR (Reposted) | Harrison | The Big File | 3 | 09-28-2005 09:17 PM |